2021-02-09

My Comments during the Lexington Parkway Site Plan Decision

Now that the Planning Commission voted 8-7 to reject the site plan for a mixed-use development proposal near Lexington and University, I'll share some of my thoughts. Stay tuned for a much longer post on this topic soon. in the meantime, this is a slightly longer version of what I said at last Friday's Planning Commission meeting. 

for a bit o context, the City Attorney has repeatedly made it clear that Comprehensive Plan as a basis for decisions on a site plan was not a legally. That was the motion on the table. 

I agree with many of the comments from the community expressing concerns about affordability in this area and with this project. We have a huge need for deeply affordable housing in Saint Paul, and this would be a great place for it. But whether we like it or not, the owner of this property wants to develop this land as market-rate housing and that’s the application before us.

But I also have to say that almost none of the arguments raised in opposition to this application are relevant. Once an applicant decides what they want to do, the Planning Commission has a clear role: we use the requirements in the zoning code to evaluate the site plan. And we treat every applicant in Saint Paul equally, no matter who they are or what block it is or who runs the nonprofit.

Unfortunately for us today, there is nothing about affordability in the Saint Paul zoning code. We don’t have any regulations about rents. Even if we might want to, we can’t legally create rules about rents by pointing to the Comprehensive Plan because the Comprehensive Plan is not a legal document. 

Because we don’t have any rules about rents or affordability in the zoning code, if we deny this application and the City Council does not overturn our decision it, I think it will end in a lawsuit and Saint Paul will lose. 

I also think that if we pretend we can vote yes or no on developments in Saint Paul because of affordability concerns, we will be misleading people, because we can’t. We should not give the impression to activists working for equity and social justice that we have that kind of power over development in Saint Paul when the zoning code that does not do that. 

If we want to put rules on affordability into the Saint Paul zoning code, it will require a difficult conversation about how to best translate our values and goals into the legal details of regulation. If we want to make affordability policies, we could look at Minneapolis, where they have adopted inclusionary zoning and are now looking at passing rent stabilization with a ballot measure. Rules like that won’t be silver bullets that solve the problem, but they are the kinds of things we can do as a Planning Commission.

Today, though, this application meets every requirement in the Saint Paul Zoning Code and we should approve it for that reason. Rejecting this application would be to mislead people about our role, would likely lose in court, and will not move us toward solutions for the housing crisis. 

I am voting for this project the zoning requirements, whether I like it or not. I hope my colleagues do the same.

I have a lot more to say about this case, and stay tuned for more on this complex housing debate soon.

2021-02-03

Another Predictable Tragedy on East 7th Street

[Pioneer Press photo of the scene of the crime.]

I hate writing these, but there was another predictable tragedy on a Saint Paul death road. Per Mara Gottfried in the Pioneer Press, here’s what happened on at 6pm last Friday:

On Friday, those who found her said they wished they could have done more and that they couldn’t believe someone could have driven away after striking her with a van in the Dayton’s Bluff neighborhood.

“That could have been anybody’s grandma or mom,” said Sarah Reeves, who stopped with her husband to help Harlan. “How do you just leave them there like that?”

…

Harlan, who lived in the area, was the kind of person who was “always in a happy, good mood,” said her brother, Bradley Harlan. She loved painting and used to be a commercial artist.

“She’s a wonderful person,” he said. “She would do anything for anybody.”

To make matters worse, the case was a hit-and-run, the second such deadly crash in Saint Paul in the last week. The driver of the van that killed Susan Harlan didn’t stay and has not yet been located. 

Because the street is so badly designed, and encourages drivers to ignore the sidewalks and neighborhood, most people kept speeding past the body laying on the asphalt.

Again, from the article [emphasis is mine]: 

Bronwyn Harper Smith, of St. Paul, was driving home on East Seventh Street — on the stretch between Arcade Street and Mounds Boulevard — when she noticed a couple of cars ahead of her going around something in the road. She figured they were avoiding a stopped car, but as she approached she saw it was a person lying in the road.

“That was the thing I got mad about right away. I was thinking, ‘Why are these people not stopping?'” said Harper Smith. “You go into that fight or flight, like, ‘Oh, my God,’ so I pulled over and told my kids to wait in the car because I had to go make sure someone was OK.”

It was about 6 p.m., and she called 911 as she walked toward the woman. She didn’t know what happened to Harlan, but she noticed the woman wasn’t wearing shoes and there were a pair down the road. Reeves thought it looked like Harlan was thrown by the force of the collision.

The Dayton’s Bluff neighborhood around East 7th Street has a lot of issues. For one thing, the street is steep and separated from downtown Saint Paul by lots of train tracks and more than one freeway. It runs at an angle, creating odd intersections with sometimes difficult sight lines. And the East 7th neighborhoods here struggle with poverty, inequality, a lack of jobs, and other issues that are difficult to solve.

[A classically deadly street design.]

[Around 18,000 cars a day pass by here, well within the new safety parameters for a three-lane road.]

One critical, solvable problem is its main street, East 7th. For decades it’s been a deadly “four-lane death road” (with little-used parking) that encourages 20,000 drivers a day to speed and weave past each other in the heart of a walkable, working class commercial district. Eons ago, this route was designated as US highway 61 for a key stretch, from downtown to Arcade, which meant it was designed by the state DOT to be primarily a highway, with minimal consideration for people on foot, bike, bus, or living nearby. 

[Looking up East 7th Street, aka US Highway 61, back in 1988.]

On a street like East 7th, a horrible crash like the one that killed Susan Harlan is predictable. I’ve wiled away countless hours in the Swede Hollow Cafe, a block from this spot, where I go up to the second floor with my laptop and stare out the window at the street below. 

I don’t know why I go to watch the street. The quiche is good, but I'm drawn there like a gawker. there's something terrible and sublime about the pull of this street, the riveting view of the city's skyline juxtaposed against a street that relentlessly hurtles drivers into a neighborhood full of people. 

This is all common knowledge to an East Sider.  About a year ago, the city got the money together to a grant to bring in a place-maker team to think about how to improve and redesign the street using temporary and art-based measures. It was a rather awkward stab at improving the street, and it was lovely for an hour or two. Within two days there wasn’t a remaining trace of the temporary traffic calming measures.

Last year, the crosswalk was improved at great expense ($500,000?) so that now, if you press the button, lights flash and for a second it seems like you’re on stage at a First Avenue show. Even then, drivers don’t always stop for people to walk across the street. And if you’re a block or two away, as was the case for Susan Harlan, shouldn’t you also be able to safely cross 7th Street? 

[If you squint, you can just make out the expensive HAWK safety crosswalk behind the memorial balloon that says "You're So Special".]

It’s worth pointing out that East 7th is a great “turnback” candidate, where the state DOT would “give” the street back to the City of Saint Paul in perpetuity, removing its state highway status and making more meaningful safety improvements possible. This can’t happen soon enough, though there needs to also be some funding provided by MnDOT to reconstruct the street and add safety measures. If they just “turn back” the street as-is, the city would be on the hook for millions of dollars in safety changes to un-do the widening that occurred for the US highway.   

There’s no reason that East 7th should be four-lanes wide. The design encourages speeding and dangerous driving in the heart of a working-class, historic neighborhood full of 19th century buildings, affordable housing, shelters for unhoused people, a blue-collar university, a whole bunch of good restaurants and stores, and thousands of people trying to get around. A traffic island median would have solved the problem at a fraction of the cost of the expensive HAWK beacon, and much more effectively. But to do that, the road would have to be reduced in size, and that is surely a step too far for MnDOT.

We need to finally change this critical Saint Paul street. It’s too late for Susan Harlan, but it might not be too late for the next person who will fall victim to this deadly street.

2021-01-27

Talking about Minneapolis Skyways for 99 Percent Invisible


[Minneapolis alley skyway.]

99 Percent Invisible has long been one of my favorite podcasts, and its founder and host, Roman Mars, even shares my love of city flags.  (Get yours today!) 

Needless to say, I was pretty thrilled when the wonderful Katie Thornton, who crafted the excellent radio documentaries on the South Minneapolis preemie hospital and women in bars (among other work), reached out to discuss Minneapolis skyways for the show. We blabbed about it for hours during the pandemic, recording in my closet buried in sound-muffling blankets, and she somehow managed to turn all that audio into a very compelling story about architecture, segregation, and urban life in downtown Minneapolis. I remain wowed with her skill at editing and storytelling. 

So check it out! Hear Roman Mars say my name way too many times, including the best quip: "the lonely life of Bill Lindeke." 

(BRB, turn that into my ringtone.)

I've written about skyways more times than I can count, given a half-dozen second-story tours, and realize by now that it's a very difficult story to tell. Check these out if you want to learn more:

Thanks so much to Katie for this amazing thing! 

Oh my. I think, I'm going to listen to it again... 


[Here's the link.]


PS. I've got the blog on hold these days, as the pandemic has gutted my usual urban flâneurie. C'est dommage. I'll get back to it someday soon, when the sidewalks fill once more with action and coffee shops come back to life.

2020-11-25

Twin City Doorways #63


[West 7th, Saint Paul.]

[Location forgotten.]

[West 7th, Saint Paul.]

[Frogtown, Saint Paul.]

[Park Rapids.]

[Blackduck.]



2020-11-24

Five Grim Takeaways from the Recent Election

[An Ohio anti-mask protest this summer.]

When the shoe finally drops, removing Trump from government will feel great. I hope he is rigorously prosecuted, and Trump losing was an absolutely necessary step. I hope you had a nice time celebrating, breathing a sigh of relief, and toasting the end of an era on that that one Saturday afternoon. 

And yet, this election was a gut punch to the future. The resulting social outlook is bleak, particularly for cities. The election dashed hopes that our country might make strides in the next few years toward fixing racial inequality, achieving economic justice, or doing anything meaningful about climate change. 

Here are five things I was thinking about this month:


Batshit Self-Delusion  

[A nurse breaks down ​in New York City.]

"They stop yelling when you intubate them," said one South Dakota nurse in a recent interview, describing her Trump-addled patients. 

So much for the vaunted politics of persuasion.

We've always been a country of religious self-deceiving whackos, but today's delusions are far more harmful than old fashioned faith. Even a half-unhinged population is more than enough to destabilize the social compact. 

I had thought that a global, apolitical, public health and economic disaster would have led to the reluctant acceptance of basic collective agreement around the need for government support and cooperation. I had thought that the specter of mass death, especially acute for older people, would shock enough rural revanchists to their senses. I had thought that a president that not only ignored a clear and palpable plague, but actively spread it through his own home and across the country, would have been many steps too far for a clear majority of people in all parts of the country. I would have thought that actual disease would have trumped self-destructive victim complex politics.

And yet, Trump’s loss was so narrow and superficial, it’s a pyrrhic victory. As case counts climb off the charts, people remain on Summit Avenue demonstrating against being prevented from killing each other. As the death rate in South Dakota goes off the charts and their sadistic governor pours fuel on the fire, dying people in hospitals rage against the very nurses that attempt to save them. Q-Anon is normal now, and what could be more disturbing? 


A Broken Country

[Just the latest.]

The election reveals how the deep grip of America’s self-delusional, “reality” show, pyramid scheme narcissism is stronger than our media or government institutions. If COVID-19 does not pull the rural right to its senses, what will?

In other words, there will be no clearer case of reality confronting ideology than the current plague. There will not be a situation where nature, facts, and science smack people so firmly the face with their own fantasies than the fall of 2020. And yet...

There are deep roots to our collective plight — most succinctly, ruthless capitalism — but there’s no denying that we are in the middle of an epic plagueFAIL. It is likely twice as many people will die in the end, and perhaps many more than that.  We are clearly a country that cannot perform even basic gestures of self-preservation. Apart from a brief moment of congressional action, fleeting as a Minnesota spring, there's been little hope for using our massive fiscal resources to offer basic social insurance and protections. Many parts of the country still don't have reliable PPE, let alone real solutions. 

All things considered, effective COVID policy — coordinated health care, broad support for wearing masks, and fiscal lifelines for workers and businesses — represents a  simple political problem. And yet, once Republican partisan vandalism took over, chances of government action waned. The constant Machiavellian logic of sabotage ensures that any semblance of social consensus will fall victim to zero-sum political bloodsport. 


Covid is the Canary in the Carbon Coal Mine

[Golfing through a forest fire in Oregon.]

Always lurking: the COVID crisis is climate change writ small. In so many ways — clarity, epistemology, and collective action — the problem presented to our societies and governments by this new virus play out far more unstoppably in the atmosphere. When you compare the pandemic to climate change, the scale and complexity of the problems increase by orders of magnitude. 

For example, decarbonizing the economy is a collective action problem far more challenging than the direct cause-and-effect relationship of today's plague. While COVID requires us to recognize the presence of an invisible virus, the atmosphere is a nonhuman actor more vague and difficult to comprehend. The accumulating forest fires, floods, derecho winds, hurricanes, heat waves, and melting permafrost are obvious enough if you want to see them, but easy to ignore if you do not. Everything clear about COVID becomes murky. 

Compared to climate change, the short-term sacrifices for coping with COVID are small. If people cannot wear a mask in public, how will they be convinced to stop driving an SUV or flying in airplanes? 

Compared to climate change, COVID's impacts on vulnerable people — hospital workers and the elderly — are direct and immediate. If people cannot see how their actions affect health care workers in their own town, how will they be convinced to care about people in Bangladesh or Guatemala?

Compared to climate change, the need for government intervention is marginal. If we cannot get Congress to fund restaurant closures, how will be be able to get it to support a Green New Deal?

People often talk about the silver linings of a crisis moment, how in a natural disaster, people come together and care about each other in surprising ways. Well, it does not always turn out that way. If Americans cannot act collectively in a sudden pandemic, there is little chance that we can do so in a far larger, slow-moving existential crisis.


Cities Remain Screwed

[The two economies in America.]

Solutions for climate change require strong cities and sweeping urban investments. And yet, cities are likely to emerge from this election in worse shape. There’s never been a time where urban and rural America are more split along partisan lines, at both micro and macro scales. 

In Minnesota, urban areas are overwhelmingly and almost uniformly Democratic while exurban and rural areas are the opposite. (The exceptions, college towns, prove the rule.) The same is true state-by-state across the country: anywhere with large dominant metro areas is a blue state, with the exception of Texas and Florida, both long-time bastions of right-wing attention and political logic. With the recent election in San Diego, the largest Republican mayors in the country are now located in Indianapolis and Jacksonville. Every other city is a Democratic bastion, and everywhere, the urban-rural divide reigns supreme.

This split has deep roots in globalization and neoliberal economic policy, which is a whole big can of worms. But the result is that rural economies are now almost entirely composed of agriculture, resource extraction, and health care, all of which entail heavy subsidies and/or external costs. Even there, the economic foundations for grievance have been eclipsed by supposedly cultural bullshit and racism, leaving little common ground or overlapping geography.

The split has bleak consequences for the country’s future thanks to anti-urban political structures. (See below.) In order for the United States to make meaningful solutions on our largest problems — most especially racial inequality and climate change — we need large-scale investment in urban infrastructure, like transit, rail, and housing. (This is not to mention necessary social infrastructure like universal public health care and UBI.) None of this will happen on the current political landscape, and policy dreams that would begin to get American cities into the same conversation with the rest of the Global North remain on hold.

What’s worse, the stubborn stalemate in the US Senate means that aid to local governments -- counties, cities, and states -- is unlikely to amount to much. The future is full of budget cuts and further disinvestment in basic infrastructure. For example, consider the fate of the already-underfunded transit systems in Boston, New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, and of course Metro Transit in the Twin Cities. As 2020 proves, undermining cities lies at the core of the Republican playbook. 


Anti-Urban Democracy

[Redistricting only happens once a decade.]
All of this is by design. From the start, this country was proudly founded on an anti-city platform. The mythology of the rural, gentleman-farmer combined with trepidation about density, crowds, and unmediated democracy set the tone for the country, baked into the constitution from the beginning by the radically anti-democratic US Senate and the Electoral College. More modern forms of disenfranchisement like hyper-gerrymandering and voter repression only accentuate this existing pattern. 

Despite large majorities at scales both large and small, left-leaning urban America cannot win a mandate. Racking up larger and large margins in urban areas and urban states will accomplish very little given the geographic calculus of our democracy.

Dreaming on a slate of electoral reforms only reveals our dim prospects. If the country had the national popular vote, got rid of the US Senate, had a congress free from partisan redistricting, and made it easy to vote, there would be healthy majorities in favor of gun control, climate action, police reform, Medicare for All, and dozens of other policies that lay far out of reach today. As a census year, this election offered the best chance to achieve some of those democratic reforms. Instead, it was a down-ballot failure that locked in minority rule for another decade.


In Sum, a Bleak Prospect

This election was ripe for change, and yet accomplished almost nothing. When faced with a life-and-death crisis and a clear abdication of responsibility by Trump, over 70 million voters chose madness, denial, and self-immolation. I don’t see much change or hope coming in the form of President Biden, nor is there much possibility of shifting our media conversations, which remain under control by an ever-more-nihilistic corporate capitalism.

Republicans are going to gerrymander the hell out of the US House, and if Democrats cannot win Senate elections in states like Maine, Montana, or Kansas, there’s little hope for large Congressional action in my lifetime. With packed courts, elections will continue to be strangled by money and voter suppression, and Biden is hardly the kind of president that can use a bully pulpit to great effect.

Meanwhile, millions of workers and most small business owners have been wrenched into making terrible choices. Meanwhile health care workers have sacrificed their health and well being for eight months, and a quarter million Americans have died anyway. 

A high-turnout election during a horrible pandemic should have ensured a mandate for change, both locally and nationally. Instead, Trump gained support and the political picture has gotten worse. Even with a new president, it's hard to see hope for a different future. There are almost no political consequences for fomenting a national plague, and our country has lost generational chance for change. 

As I said, it's bleak.